MyToken data monitoring shows that on 【May 3rd, 18:39】 (Beijing Time), an address starting with 【0x3b98】 transferred 【138368889 USDT】 to an address starting with 【0xdac1】, with a total value of approximately 【138.19 million】. Real time monitoring of large transfers：https://www.mytokencap.com/large-transfers/

MyToken data monitoring shows that on 【May 3rd, 18:37】 (Beijing Time), an address starting with 【0xb0a2】 transferred 【138368889 USDT】 to an address starting with 【0xdac1】, with a total value of approximately 【138.21 million】. Real time monitoring of large transfers：https://www.mytokencap.com/large-transfers/

According to Odaily Planet Daily, MegaETH head PaperImperium disclosed documents from the Southern District of New York Federal Court on the X platform, showing that a US court has issued an injunction against Arbitrum DAO, prohibiting it from transferring approximately $71 million in ETH assets frozen in the KelpDAO hack. In response, "chain detective" ZachXBT posted on the X platform, stating that some US law firms are using their investigative work and on-chain evidence to help victims of hacking incidents file legal claims, but this practice actually hinders victims from receiving compensation/recovery funds. ZachXBT added that in previous hacks involving the Lazarus Group, such law firms typically intervene only after the on-chain funds have been traced or frozen, and then file follow-up legal actions that are weakly related to the crypto incident itself. They have also used similar strategies in cases like Harmony and Bybit, engaging in "free-riding" claims. He called on the crypto community to establish a DAO to resist such behavior.

According to Odaily Planet Daily, MegaETH head PaperImperium disclosed on the X platform documents from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, showing that the U.S. court has issued an injunction against Arbitrum DAO, prohibiting it from transferring approximately $71 million in ETH assets frozen in the KelpDAO hack. The plaintiffs sought to use these funds to enforce outstanding judgments against North Korea for terrorism, abduction, and other cases involving North Korea over the years, and have applied for substituted service of process to issue legal notice to Arbitrum DAO, designating it as a potentially accountable "partnership." The court documents also state that Arbitrum DAO has a Security Council governed by ARB holders, possessing the capability to act in emergency situations; therefore, members who refuse to cooperate may face contempt of court and other legal liabilities. The market believes this case may become a significant example of the U.S. judicial system directly constraining the governance structure of DAOs, further highlighting the compliance pressures on DeFi protocols within the existing legal framework.

According to Odaily Planet Daily, the Ethereum Foundation has released a summary of the Soldøgn Interop work, stating that key goals for the Glamsterdam upgrade have been largely achieved. These include reaching consensus on a post-upgrade Gas Limit of 200 million, ensuring stable operation of the ePBS external Builder process, and finalizing the EIP-8037 Gas repricing parameters. The Glamsterdam upgrade focuses on securely increasing the Gas Limit to expand Ethereum's throughput, while EIP-8037 will prevent the state from expanding indefinitely due to high Gas Limits by increasing the cost of state creation. The Ethereum Foundation also stated that most clients are running stably on glamsterdam-devnet-2 and have successfully tested the entire external Builder process. Furthermore, substantial progress has been made on FOCIL, native account abstraction, and Hegotá upgrade-related features. In the coming weeks, core developers will continue to harden clients, refine testing, and merge code. The final parameters will be publicly confirmed at the AllCoreDevs conference.