Bitcoin fell below $75,000 and moved toward $74,000, while spot BTC ETFs posted $1.28B in weekly net outflows and liquidations exceeded $1B. Ethereum slid to $2,123, with spot ETH ETFs seeing $184.51M in net outflows. MARA sold 13,597 BTC and BitMine added 9,587 ETH, as Coinbase secured an OCC trust bank charter and NYSE's tokenized stock platform chose Avalanche.
Market and Fund Flows
According to crypto.news, the crypto market came under clear pressure in the latest trading session. Bitcoin fell below $75,000 and moved further down toward $74,000; spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded $1.28 billion in weekly net outflows, and leveraged liquidations exceeded $1 billion. Ethereum dropped to $2,123, while spot ETH ETFs saw $184.51 million in net outflows. The spot ETF net outflow figure is on a weekly basis, and the liquidation figure is as disclosed for the same period. This article focuses on ETF fund flows and leveraged liquidations, and supplements this with supply-side developments at mining companies as well as public progress in industry compliance and RWA. In addition, public progress in industry compliance and RWA includes: Coinbase obtained a full OCC national trust bank charter, formally bringing institutional crypto custody under federal regulation; the NYSE tokenized stock platform selected Avalanche as its core settlement ledger, as a traditional financial giant adopts a public blockchain to settle tokenized securities, marking a new implementation case in the RWA direction.
Bitcoin: ETF Outflows and Liquidations Add to Price Pressure
Bitcoin's correction is not merely a price phenomenon. Spot BTC ETFs recorded $1.28 billion in weekly net outflows, indicating net redemptions at the product level; liquidations exceeding $1 billion show that leveraged positions were forced to close during the price decline. The two data points appeared in the same period, pushing Bitcoin toward $74,000 after it fell below $75,000. According to publicly disclosed data, the combination of ETF outflows and liquidations occurred simultaneously against the backdrop of falling prices, with the two reflecting changes in product-level funds and passive adjustments in the derivatives market, respectively. As of current public information, the specific product distribution of the outflows, the currency composition of liquidations, or daily changes have not been disclosed, so it is inappropriate to infer that a single factor caused the entire decline. The market can still observe through subsequent product subscription and redemption data whether the pressure continues.
Ethereum: Weaker Price Coexists with Institutional Increases and Decreases
Ethereum's price fell to $2,123, and spot ETH ETFs saw $184.51 million in net outflows. Compared with Bitcoin, ETH's ETF outflow scale was smaller, but the price and fund flow moved in the same direction, showing that the adjustment was not limited to Bitcoin. Notably, BitMine increased its holdings by 9,587 ETH against the trend, a move that contrasts with the net outflows from ETH ETFs: the former is a single institution's increase in holdings, while the latter is overall net redemption from spot ETF products. The coexistence of the two shows a divergence in institutional fund behavior. A single institution's increase cannot be equated with a reversal in ETF fund flows, nor can it be used to infer that Ethereum's price has already found support; however, its increase provides another angle for observing institutions' willingness to allocate to Ethereum.
Mining Company Supply Side: MARA Selling and Financial Pressure
Major mining company MARA sold 13,597 BTC, cashing out $1.1 billion and repaying a $750 million loan; its Q3 revenue fell 35%. This set of data involves asset sales, debt repayment, and revenue changes at the same time, reflecting the financial pressure mining companies face in the current market environment. In terms of market impact, large-scale BTC sales add supply-side information to the tradable market, but as of current public information, the specific timing distribution of the sales, buyer structure, or subsequent sale plans have not been disclosed, so this cannot be directly equated with sustained market selling pressure. What can be confirmed is that mining companies' balance sheet adjustments have become a window for observing changes in market supply, and subsequent disclosures deserve to be included in the supply-side observation framework.
Risk Warning and Follow-up Focus
Taken together, the current market pressure comes from multiple publicly disclosed channels: spot Bitcoin ETFs saw $1.28 billion in net outflows and liquidations exceeded $1 billion; spot Ethereum ETFs saw $184.51 million in net outflows; MARA sold 13,597 BTC and cashed out $1.1 billion; BitMine increased its holdings by 9,587 ETH. It should be emphasized that these data relate to different assets, different products, and different institutions, and cannot be simply added together into a single "total market outflow," nor can they replace one another. ETF net outflows reflect changes in product-level funds, liquidations reflect passive adjustments of leveraged positions, mining company sales reflect corporate financial actions, and a single institution's increase in holdings reflects an individual holder's allocation choice. Together they form the market pressure narrative, but their scope of impact and persistence are not the same.
Follow-up worth watching: Bitcoin's price performance around the $74,000-$75,000 range, and subscription and redemption changes after spot BTC ETFs' $1.28 billion weekly net outflow; whether the trend of $184.51 million in net outflows from spot ETH ETFs continues while Ethereum trades around $2,123; subsequent disclosures after BitMine increased its holdings by 9,587 ETH and MARA sold 13,597 BTC and repaid a $750 million loan. Also worth watching: business implementation after Coinbase obtained the OCC national trust bank charter, and progress in settlement arrangements after the NYSE tokenized stock platform selected Avalanche. Based on existing public disclosures, the market remains in a stage where price retracement, ETF fund outflows, leveraged liquidations, and mining company financial adjustments are intertwined, and no data indicates that the above pressures have been lifted. The above content is based on publicly disclosed information and does not constitute investment advice.
.jpg)