Sure, important question. There are two vectors of affecting global events: 1. Affecting the *structure* of the world in a way which is unopinionated on individual situations, but at the same time has clear tendencies that lead to desirable outcomes (eg. enfranchising otherwise disenfranchised people). This inevitably involves acting on some opinions about what high-level properties are good to see more of in the world. 2. Affecting specific individual situations. This inevitably involves acting on your opinions on those situations. I think the it's healthy for the Ethereum community as a community to conceptualize itself as doing (1) and not doing (2). The Ethereum Foundation is not Ethereum, but even the Ethereum Foundation should bias heavily toward (1). At the same time, each contributor to Ethereum is not some godlike avatar of Ethereum, they are a human being, and so they will inevitably have opinions of type (2), and various people will have various side projects (on the low